Crest design

 
steven harris
 
Avatar
 
 
steven harris
Total Posts:  696
Joined  30-07-2008
 
 
 
26 December 2012 18:29
 

hollywood1765;97046 wrote:

That’s what I had hoped. So you can "turn" the crest any where within 90 degrees and still be "correct"

I’d say that a helm and its crest are generally shown either in profile or face-on.  I’m given to understand that paper heraldy at one time assigned meaning to the two possitions (peers and whatnot were face-on while we peons had to settle for the side-view).  This isn’t the casecanymore, and the helm and its crest can have either of the two positions, as long as they pair each other.

 
hollywood1765
 
Avatar
 
 
hollywood1765
Total Posts:  163
Joined  29-06-2012
 
 
 
26 December 2012 20:09
 

Once Again I want to thank you all for you help and input!!!!!!!!!!!

You all have been so very helpful and I truly am humbled by your knowledge and willingness to help!!!

 
Joseph McMillan
 
Avatar
 
 
Joseph McMillan
Total Posts:  7658
Joined  08-06-2004
 
 
 
26 December 2012 23:18
 

steven harris;97050 wrote:

I’d say that a helm and its crest are generally shown either in profile or face-on. I’m given to understand that paper heraldy at one time assigned meaning to the two possitions (peers and whatnot were face-on while we peons had to settle for the side-view). This isn’t the casecanymore, and the helm and its crest can have either of the two positions, as long as they pair each other.


Helms may also be shown in 3/4 perspective and often are.  See Marie Lynskey’s emblazonment of my arms in the AHS members’ roll.

 
Michael F. McCartney
 
Avatar
 
 
Michael F. McCartney
Total Posts:  3535
Joined  24-05-2004
 
 
 
27 December 2012 16:59
 

Ditto Joe’s comment.

In effect, that’s three positions - affrontee, profile and half-way between.  In the bad old days of paper heraldry, the blazon would explicitly (or implicitly - e.g. "on a helm befitting his degree") specify the position of the helm, and also specify the position of the crest—sometimes these would artistically conflict, but still be blazoned & shown that way.  Nowadays the practice seems to be to leave the position of the helm to the artist’s discretion (i.e. not pinned down in the blazon), with the crest aligned to the helm; though you will still see carryovers from the older practice.

 
Joseph McMillan
 
Avatar
 
 
Joseph McMillan
Total Posts:  7658
Joined  08-06-2004
 
 
 
27 December 2012 17:56
 

Re paper heraldry:  in some countries, the 3/4 (or 45 degree) placement was designated for particular social ranks, but in British-Irish practice it was often a way of getting around the awkwardness of a mismatched crest and helm.  Let’s say someone’s crest was a stag’s head caboshed (affronty without the neck) but the particular someone was not a knight and therefore not entitled to an affronty helm.  The artist would draw the helm sufficiently in profile to pass muster with the College of Arms, but not so much that the deer would look like it was staring off over the helmet-wearer’s left ear.

In my case, my crest looks natural on a helm in profile, and I was and am puzzled by Miss Lynskey’s choice of a 3/4 orientation for the helm, but it is what it is.

 
Michael F. McCartney
 
Avatar
 
 
Michael F. McCartney
Total Posts:  3535
Joined  24-05-2004
 
 
 
28 December 2012 16:50
 

Looking at Joe’s page in our on-line roll, & Ms. L’s depiction of Joe’s helm in the 3/4 (45 degree) orientation vs. Joe’s own artwork(the second one, with the flowery mantling similar to Ms. L’s but with the helm in profile):  my guess is that Ms. L chose the 3/4 version as the visual better "fit" of helm & mantling, with the crest in profile being just a little off but still close enough to look OK;

while Joe (consciously or not) made the opposite choice, i.e. helm & crest both in profile, with the flowery mantling just a little bit off but still close enough to look OK.

A third option would have been to show all three elements in 3/4 view—i.e. to attempt to show the crested helm as it would have looked in 3-D turned to the 3/4 position— though in a necessarily 2-D rendition, it might have been a bit more difficult to draw Joe’s crest convincingly in the 3/4 orientation.

 

Which I suppose is one example of the merits, or indeed the necessity, of allowing for artistic variations & license.

 
ninest123
 
Avatar
 
 
ninest123
Total Posts:  1703
Joined  29-06-2017
 
 
 
29 June 2017 21:28
 

mt0630
marc jacobs bags
ralph lauren sale clearance
fred perry polo
nike air max
christian louboutin outlet
ralph lauren outlet
cheap jordans
coach factory outlet
discount oakley sunglasses
clarks shoes
coach outlet
birkenstock shoes
nike outlet online
cheap nfl jerseys
cheap jordans
true religion jeans
fitflops
nike free run black
michael kors canada
coach outlet
red bottoms
fitflops
toms shoes outlet
golden state warriors jerseys
rolex replica watches
michael kors uk
nmd adidas
cheap jordans
ray ban sunglasses discount
pandora bracelet
cheap mlb jerseys
longchamp handbags
sac longchamp pas cher
ray ban sunglasses
parker pens
pandora uk
vans outlet store
coach outlet
nike air max 90
sac longchamp
pandora charms sale
adidas nmd
kate spade outlet
adidas shoes
ray ban sunglasses
adidas outlet
coach outlet
ray ban sunglasses
oakley sunglasses outlet
christian louboutin shoes
fake rolex
tods outlet
coach outlet store
louboutin pas cher
louis vuitton outlet
coach factory outlet
adidas outlet
polo ralph lauren outlet online
nike outlet
longchamp outlet store
michael kors bags
clarks outlet
birkenstock sandals
salomon shoes
nike outlet store
coach outlet
clarks outlet
mulberry handbags
cheap ray ban sunglasses
dansko shoes
christian louboutin sale
adidas superstar shoes
pandora jewelry
ray ban sunglasses
pandora charms
adidas uk
cheap mont blanc
nmd adidas
official coach factory outlet
michael kors bags
cheap oakley sunglasses
adidas shoes
mulberry bags
polo ralph lauren outlet online
nike air max outlet
yeezy boost 350
ralph lauren uk
coach factory outlet
fitflops
adidas nmd
pandora soldes
nike air max
adidas pas cher
mt0630xfsd sd