Lost Arms of California

 
arriano
 
Avatar
 
 
arriano
Total Posts:  1303
Joined  20-08-2004
 
 
 
10 March 2009 16:52
 

Today I came across an interesting passage in the book "A History of California and An Extended History of Los Angeles and Its Environs" by J.M. Guinn (1915). In it he describes actions in 1821 by a disputacion (the group that made laws for the then-Mexican territory). The actions included a plan to change the name of Alta California to Montezuma, changing the name of Los Angeles and making it the capital, and also designing a new coat of arms.

Quote:

"A coat of arms was adopted for the territory. It consisted of an oval with the figure of an oak tree on one side, an olive tree on the other and a plumed Indian in the center with his bow and quiver, just in the act of stepping across the mythical straits of Anian. The memorial was sent to Mexico, but the supreme government paid no attention to it."

 
Donnchadh
 
Avatar
 
 
Donnchadh
Total Posts:  4101
Joined  13-07-2005
 
 
 
10 March 2009 17:42
 

hmm. doesn’t sound better than the one they have now. one would hope with it being older it would. oh well.

 
Marcus K
 
Avatar
 
 
Marcus K
Total Posts:  3368
Joined  06-05-2005
 
 
 
10 March 2009 18:46
 

Well the 19th Century is not considered as one of the more prominent periods in the heraldic history.

 
Donnchadh
 
Avatar
 
 
Donnchadh
Total Posts:  4101
Joined  13-07-2005
 
 
 
11 March 2009 01:40
 

true enough…but i was hoping that it was a carry over from an older one…one with more…traditional Spanish style. maybe i’m wrong. oh well.

 
Marcus K
 
Avatar
 
 
Marcus K
Total Posts:  3368
Joined  06-05-2005
 
 
 
11 March 2009 09:32
 

Well one can only hope, but this time your hope was unfortunately in vain.

 
arriano
 
Avatar
 
 
arriano
Total Posts:  1303
Joined  20-08-2004
 
 
 
11 March 2009 16:43
 

Donnchadh;67267 wrote:

hmm. doesn’t sound better than the one they have now. one would hope with it being older it would. oh well.


Agreed. It’s basically the same in a long line of state "coats of arms" that use a pretty picture rather than a heraldic design. Pity.

 
Michael Y. Medvedev
 
Avatar
 
 
Michael Y. Medvedev
Total Posts:  844
Joined  18-01-2008
 
 
 
11 March 2009 20:09
 

Quote:

disputacion

Sorry… diputacion?

 
Alexander Liptak
 
Avatar
 
 
Alexander Liptak
Total Posts:  846
Joined  06-06-2008
 
 
 
12 March 2009 07:25
 

Donnchadh;67267 wrote:

hmm. doesn’t sound better than the one they have now. one would hope with it being older it would. oh well.


It seems fine from the description so long as the strait is represented in a more traditional way.  Trees and human figures are common elements.  Massachusetts uses such a figure with bow as well.

 

The seal that California uses is not a heraldic device at all, yet was not intended to be.  The state’s flag, however, could easily be made heraldic.

 
arriano
 
Avatar
 
 
arriano
Total Posts:  1303
Joined  20-08-2004
 
 
 
12 March 2009 14:02
 

Michael Y. Medvedev;67298 wrote:

Sorry… diputacion?

 


Yes, your correct. My typo.