Abp. Manila

 
gselvester
 
Avatar
 
 
gselvester
Total Posts:  2683
Joined  11-05-2004
 
 
 
14 December 2011 22:07
 

Arms of the Most Rev. Luis Tagle, newly installed archbishop of Manila.

http://www.rcam.org/ARCHBISHOP_TAGLE/coat_of_arms/coat_of_arms_image.JPG

 
Joseph McMillan
 
Avatar
 
 
Joseph McMillan
Total Posts:  7658
Joined  08-06-2004
 
 
 
14 December 2011 22:45
 

gselvester;90593 wrote:

Arms of the Most Rev. Luis Tagle, newly installed archbishop of Manila.

http://www.rcam.org/ARCHBISHOP_TAGLE/coat_of_arms/coat_of_arms_image.JPG


Well, the arms of the see are reasonably attractive. And the galero and tassels are nicely drawn. And it seems to be standard archbishop’s cross rather than a picture of an actual processional cross. And…no, I think I’m done.

 
gselvester
 
Avatar
 
 
gselvester
Total Posts:  2683
Joined  11-05-2004
 
 
 
15 December 2011 01:50
 

Agreed on all counts.

 
Marcus K
 
Avatar
 
 
Marcus K
Total Posts:  3368
Joined  06-05-2005
 
 
 
16 December 2011 10:53
 

Well for his personal Arms the Archbishop could have done much better.

 
Dohrman Byers
 
Avatar
 
 
Dohrman Byers
Total Posts:  760
Joined  02-08-2007
 
 
 
16 December 2011 11:46
 

Marcus K;90641 wrote:

Well for his personal Arms the Archbishop could have done much better.


To say the least!

 
Boanerges83
 
Avatar
 
 
Boanerges83
Total Posts:  13
Joined  21-02-2013
 
 
 
27 February 2013 23:09
 

As a Filipino, I bemoan the fact that whatever passes for a heraldic authority here has very limited jurisdiction and is not in the business of granting or registering arms… at least to my knowledge (I hesitate to suspect that the bureaucrats therein have no clue as to the aesthetics of heraldry… but let us leave it at that).

Most, if not all, current bishops from the Philippines do not have their own coats of arms prior to the episcopacy. When they are thus elevated, they tend to devise their own arms based on their career and desired theme for their tenure. Hence, we have arms that depict a curriculum vitae. A common feature is that the shield is tierced per fess (see the arms of the late Cardinal Sin, and of Cardinal Rosales, Aep. emeritus Manilensis), with each field charged with a different device that may or may not be examples of good heraldry.

 

EDIT:  Here’s a link to Cardinal Sin’s arms in stained glass:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Coat_of_Arms_Jaime_Cardinal_Sin.jpg

 
steven harris
 
Avatar
 
 
steven harris
Total Posts:  696
Joined  30-07-2008
 
 
 
28 February 2013 11:31
Boanerges83
 
Avatar
 
 
Boanerges83
Total Posts:  13
Joined  21-02-2013
 
 
 
17 March 2013 22:31
 

steven harris;97718 wrote:

a nice example of how not to design arms

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f0/Coat_of_arms_of_Luis_Antonio_Tagle.svg/200px-Coat_of_arms_of_Luis_Antonio_Tagle.svg.png

I reiterate that most Filipinos are not armigerous, and most Filipino bishops only assume their arms upon elevation. That said, my lord Tagle tries to do too much with his arms… and misses the point by at least a mile. Call it CV heraldry, I call it chopsuey heraldry.

 
steven harris
 
Avatar
 
 
steven harris
Total Posts:  696
Joined  30-07-2008
 
 
 
18 March 2013 08:40
 

Boanerges83;97947 wrote:

I reiterate that most Filipinos are not armigerous, and most Filipino bishops only assume their arms upon elevation. That said, my lord Tagle tries to do too much with his arms… and misses the point by at least a mile. Call it CV heraldry, I call it chopsuey heraldry.

That’s not just in the Philippines.  I’d say that most priests in most countries do not assume arms until be are named bishops.  The CV-style of heraldry is all too common.

Reason #8128 why the Chruch needs some kind of heraldic office.

 
Joseph McMillan
 
Avatar
 
 
Joseph McMillan
Total Posts:  7658
Joined  08-06-2004
 
 
 
18 March 2013 09:35
 

steven harris;97949 wrote:

Reason #8128 why the Chruch needs some kind of heraldic office.


Reason #8129 why it doesn’t:  heraldic offices are just as capable of perpetrating things like this as any private person, only they are "okay" because they’re official:

 

http://www.americanheraldry.org/pages/uploads/Roll/dinwiddie.gif

Lyon King of Arms (1751) to Col Robert Dinwiddie.

 

http://www.americanheraldry.org/pages/uploads/Roll/hopkins3.gif

Garter and Clarenceux Kings of Arms (1764) to Capt Joseph Hopkins.

 

http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeohzt4/MacMillan-Armorial/MacMillan-Mur2.gif

Lyon King of Arms (1964) to William McMillan.

 

http://i.ebayimg.com/t/RARE-PRE-WWII-U-S-ARMY-10TH-INFANTRY-REGIMENT-NYNG-OBSOLETE-DUI-PINBACK-CREST-/00/s/MTYwMFgxNTQ5/$KGrHqMOKi0E5fYwfOT6BOlMZ9HsYg~~60_35.JPG

Heraldic Services Division (now TIOH) (1923) to 10th New York Infantry Regiment (now 210th Armor)

 
Boanerges83
 
Avatar
 
 
Boanerges83
Total Posts:  13
Joined  21-02-2013
 
 
 
19 March 2013 02:12
 

Joseph McMillan;97955 wrote:

Reason #8129 why it doesn’t:  heraldic offices are just as capable of perpetrating things like this as any private person, only they are "okay" because they’re official:

http://www.americanheraldry.org/pages/uploads/Roll/dinwiddie.gif

Lyon King of Arms (1751) to Col Robert Dinwiddie.

 

http://www.americanheraldry.org/pages/uploads/Roll/hopkins3.gif

Garter and Clarenceux Kings of Arms (1764) to Capt Joseph Hopkins.

 

http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeohzt4/MacMillan-Armorial/MacMillan-Mur2.gif

Lyon King of Arms (1964) to William McMillan.

 

http://i.ebayimg.com/t/RARE-PRE-WWII-U-S-ARMY-10TH-INFANTRY-REGIMENT-NYNG-OBSOLETE-DUI-PINBACK-CREST-/00/s/MTYwMFgxNTQ5/$KGrHqMOKi0E5fYwfOT6BOlMZ9HsYg~~60_35.JPG

Heraldic Services Division (now TIOH) (1923) to 10th New York Infantry Regiment (now 210th Armor)

Heraldic Murphy’s Law?

I thank God and the College that my lord Tagle was not elected, or we would have had to deal with his arms for a pontificate. Let us worry less now until the next Sede Vacante.