English practice for Order of St. John

 
Joseph McMillan
 
Avatar
 
 
Joseph McMillan
Total Posts:  7658
Joined  08-06-2004
 
 
 
23 January 2007 15:10
 

Confirming that the English Kings of Arms do not grant the knight’s open visored helm to knights of the Venerable Order of St. John, here are the arms of a knight of the order with the normal gentleman’s helm, taken from the letters patent granting the arms.  (The presence of the Maltese cross behind the shield was the subject of a learned but speculative debate on rec.heraldry last month.)  The arms are those of John Robert Brown; the image is posted in the online Burke’s armorial.

http://armorial-register.com/arms-en/arms-images-en/brown-jr-arms.jpg

 
Charles E. Drake
 
Avatar
 
 
Charles E. Drake
Total Posts:  553
Joined  27-05-2006
 
 
 
23 January 2007 15:29
 

But are you sure that is correct?

The gentleman was gazetted as Chaplain in the Venerable Order 27 August 2003, which grade is now equivalent to that of Commander.

 

His Burke’s entry states his grant from the COA was dated 27 January 2004, which means he was unlikely to have been promoted to knight before the date of his grant.

 

Not arguing, just trying to clarify this in my own mind.

 

/Charles

 
Michael F. McCartney
 
Avatar
 
 
Michael F. McCartney
Total Posts:  3535
Joined  24-05-2004
 
 
 
23 January 2007 15:43
 

Either way, IMO a most attractive design, beautifully executed, and (now for the word from our sponsor) depicted in a manner eminently appropriate for display by an American in the US.

The arms themselves (shield) are also an excellentr example of a clean, simple, elegant desiogn using well-known charges, yet creatively arranged so as to be unique without being at all "busy"—them Brits shure do nice work!

 
Donnchadh
 
Avatar
 
 
Donnchadh
Total Posts:  4101
Joined  13-07-2005
 
 
 
23 January 2007 19:31
 

it is beautiful work Mike.

 
snelson
 
Avatar
 
 
snelson
Total Posts:  464
Joined  03-06-2005
 
 
 
23 January 2007 19:53
 

You are correct.  The College of Arms depicts the arms of knights in the MVOSJ with a gentleman’s helm rather than a knight’s helm (excepting, of course, when the armiger is also a knight in another British Order of Chivalry or a knight bachelor).  Of course, peers who are also a KStJ use a peer’s helm.  For example, you can see a gentleman’s helm in the arms of J. P. Brooke-Little (far right) in the margin of this 1985 devisal of arms issued to the Cathedral Church of the Advent in Birmingham, Alabama:

http://members.lycos.co.uk/heraldryjunkyard/heraldic2.jpg

 

Brooke-Little was made a KStJ in 1975.

 

Cheers,

 
Charles E. Drake
 
Avatar
 
 
Charles E. Drake
Total Posts:  553
Joined  27-05-2006
 
 
 
23 January 2007 23:45
 

However, the diploma of Guy Sainty as a KSJ shows the open helm, presumably indicative of that status.  I realize this is not a grant from the COA, but is an official document. I had assumed that the design painted on the diploma was vetted with the COA.

http://www.sainty.org/saintyarms.htm

 

/Charles

 
David Boven
 
Avatar
 
 
David Boven
Total Posts:  1063
Joined  29-04-2004
 
 
 
24 January 2007 00:11
 

I seem to remember that Guy Sainty had his arms matriculated in Scotland simply to have a patent with an open helm. He admitted that this was vanity on his part, but it would seem that Lord Lyon gives K.St.J.s a knights helm.

 
Charles E. Drake
 
Avatar
 
 
Charles E. Drake
Total Posts:  553
Joined  27-05-2006
 
 
 
24 January 2007 00:25
 

Oh yes, I think I recall reading this somewhere, but had forgotten the details.  I remember his comment regarding something and vanity, however.  Thanks.

/Charles

 
liongam
 
Avatar
 
 
liongam
Total Posts:  343
Joined  19-02-2006
 
 
 
24 January 2007 02:41
 

David has pipped me to the post.  I believe that he right in saying that at one time when either Bailiffs Grand Cross or Knights of the Most Venerable Order of St John approached Lyon Court for a grant of arms or to matriculate existing arms they were allowed a knights helm, although I am not too sure as to the present policy at Lyon Court regarding this.

Yours aye,

 

John