Sovereignty of Native American tribes

 
kimon
 
Avatar
 
 
kimon
Total Posts:  1035
Joined  28-03-2008
 
 
 
12 September 2011 16:17
 

I was thinking the other day about the status of the various Native American tribes within the USA and their sovereignty.

I read several articles online and found various opinions but, they all boil down to the tribes have a status that is subject to the US legislature (and not the executive) at a federal level only. The individual states that make up the Union do not have authority over the tribes except for those covered by Public Law 280 (namely: California, Minnesota, Nebraska, Oregon and Alaska).

 

However, I’m not clear on what exactly is their status. What would be their European historical equivalent (if any)?

 
Luis Cid
 
Avatar
 
 
Luis Cid
Total Posts:  163
Joined  03-09-2009
 
 
 
12 September 2011 18:52
 

Quickly what comes to mind in Europe of the middle ages would be the church.  Also, in the Holy Roman Empire privilages held by some cities.  In the later Roman Empire you could look to similar legal status given to the Gothic tribes and others within Roman provinces.

 
David Pritchard
 
Avatar
 
 
David Pritchard
Total Posts:  2058
Joined  26-01-2007
 
 
 
18 September 2011 07:00
 

kimon;87672 wrote:

However, I’m not clear on what exactly is their status. What would be their European historical equivalent (if any)?


Perhaps the Emirate of Buhkara within the Russian Empire during the years 1873-1917; the Sultanate of Rwanda as a self governing part of German East Africa (1885-1916). The Åland Islands as part of Finland 1920 to the present and Éire during those akward years of 1922-1937.